Correlation between the main clinical, imaging, and arthroscopy findings in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

The purpose of this work was to prospectively correlate the most characteristic clinical symptoms of temporomandibular disorders, such as pain and limitation of mouth opening, with the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (disc position, degenerative changes, and effusion) and arthroscopy findings (roofing, synovitis, chondromalacia, adhesions, and perforations). These examinations were performed in 298 patients diagnosed with internal derangement refractory to conservative treatment. The mean age of the patients was 38.59 years; 92.6% were female. The t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to correlate the findings. Significant relationships were found between pain and disc displacement without reduction (P = 0.033) and effusion (P = 0.003) on MRI, coinciding with correlations between pain and roofing of 0-25% (P = 0.016) and synovitis (P = 0.001) on arthroscopy. A significant relationship was also observed between mouth opening limitation and the presence of osteoarthrosis (P = 0.018) on MRI, and between mouth opening limitation and synovitis (P = 0.022), chondromalacia (P = 0.002), and adhesions (P < 0.001) on arthroscopy. All of these findings were observed in patients with a poor initial clinical situation, which highlights the considerable potential of correlating these data with imaging and arthroscopy findings.

Clinical usefulness of serum angiotensin converting enzyme in silicosis.

INTRODUCTION: Silicosis is an irreversible and incurable disease. Preventive measures to eliminate exposure are the only effective way to reduce morbidity and mortality. In such situations, having a biomarker for early diagnosis or to predict evolution would be very useful in order to improve control of the disease. The elevation of serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (sACE) in silicosis has been described in previous studies, although its relationship with severity and prognosis is not clear. AIMS: To determine the levels of sACE in a cohort of patients with exposure to silica dust with and without silicosis, and to assess their impact on the prognosis of the aforementioned patients. METHOD: Prospective observational study on patients treated in a silicosis clinic from 2009 to 2018. sACE levels and pulmonary function tests were performed. Radiological progression was assessed in patients who had already had 2 X-rays of the thorax and / or two CT scans with at least a 1-year interval, from the time of inclusion in the study. RESULTS: A total of 413 cases of silicosis were confirmed, as well as 73 with exposure to silica dust but without silicosis. The mean sACE level for healthy subjects was 27.5±7.3U/L, for exposed patients without silicosis it was 49.6±24.2U/L, for simple silicosis it was 57.8±31,3U/L and for complicated silicosis it was 74.5±38.6U/L. Patients with a higher sACE generally progressed radiologically during follow-up (73.3±38.0 vs. 60.4±33.7; p<.001) and so the category of silicosis changed (73,9±38.1 vs. 62.5±34.6; p<.021). CONCLUSIONS: sACE was elevated in patients with silicosis, and the greater its severity, the higher it was, which is associated with disease progression measured radiologically or as a category change of silicosis.

miRNAs in liquid biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is often diagnosed at advanced stages and is associated with poor survival rates. Increasing evidence suggests that microRNAs (miRNAs) present in liquid biopsies could be potential biomarkers for non-invasive OSCC diagnosis. Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of blood and salivary miRNAs in detecting OSCC. A literature search using PubMed EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken up to February 2019. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2, and sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a bivariate random-effect meta-analysis model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the heterogeneity. Twenty-five study units from 16 articles with 2562 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of blood and salivary miRNAs in the diagnosis of OSCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.84), respectively, and the pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.31 (95% CI: 3.38-5.51) and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20-0.32), respectively. The overall area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.46 (95% CI: 13.37-34.45). These findings provide evidence regarding the potential clinical application of blood and salivary miRNAs as a novel, non-invasive, and accurate diagnostic tool for OSCC.

[Intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity in patients with recurring multiple sclerosis: the results of a double-blind randomised clinical trial]. / Estimulacion magnetica transcraneal theta-burst intermitente para el tratamiento de la espasticidad en pacientes con esclerosis multiple recurrente: resultados de un ensayo clinico aleatorizado doble ciego.

AIM: It has been suggested that the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could be useful as a non-pharmacological treatment for spasticity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and neurophysiological effects of high-frequency intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on lower limb spasticity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients in the remitting phase of the disease were randomly allocated to sham or magnetic therapy group and underwent iTBS over contralateral motor cortex of the most affected leg once a day for two weeks. Each session consisted of 10 bursts containing three pulses at 50 Hz repeated at 200 ms intervals (5 Hz) every 10 s for a total of 600 stimuli. The iTBS effect was assessed by using clinical (such as the Modified Ashworth Scale) and neuro-physiological (H/M amplitude ratio and cortical silent period duration) parameters. RESULTS: Two-week iTBS over motor cortex of the most affected leg did not produce any significant clinical effect on spasticity. However, it decreases the H/M amplitude ratio and increases duration of cortical silent period but not significantly, in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: The stimulation protocol used in this study does not have significant therapeutic effect. Therefore, we do recommend further studies as neurophysiological changes were evident.

TITLE: Estimulacion magnetica transcraneal theta-burst intermitente para el tratamiento de la espasticidad en pacientes con esclerosis multiple recurrente: resultados de un ensayo clinico aleatorizado doble ciego.Objetivo. La estimulacion magnetica transcraneal repetitiva podria ser util como tratamiento no farmacologico para la espasticidad. El objetivo de este estudio es reevaluar el efecto clinico y los cambios neurofisiologicos que produce la estimulacion theta-burst intermitente (ETBi) sobre la espasticidad de las extremidades inferiores en pacientes con esclerosis multiple recurrente en un ensayo aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Pacientes y metodos. Diecisiete pacientes en la fase remitente de la enfermedad fueron aleatoriamente asignados al grupo placebo o al grupo de tratamiento activo mediante estimulacion magnetica transcraneal repetitiva con protocolo ETBi sobre la corteza motora contralateral de la pierna mas afectada. El procedimiento consistio en 10 sesiones diarias durante dos semanas. Cada sesion consistio en 10 rafagas que contenian tres pulsos a 50 Hz repetidos a intervalos de 200 ms (5 Hz) cada 10 s para un total de 600 estimulos. El efecto de ETBi se evaluo mediante el uso de parametros clinicos (como la escala de Ashworth modificada) y neurofisiologicos (ratio de amplitud H/M y duracion del periodo cortical silente). Resultados. Dos semanas de ETBi sobre la corteza motora de la pierna mas afectada no produjeron ningun efecto clinico significativo sobre la espasticidad en pacientes con esclerosis multiple recurrente. Sin embargo, aunque de forma no significativa, se observo disminucion de la ratio de amplitud H/M y un aumento de la duracion del periodo cortical silente. Conclusion. El protocolo de estimulacion utilizado en este estudio no parece tener un efecto terapeutico significativo. Sin embargo, recomendamos estudios adicionales, ya que los cambios neurofisiologicos fueron evidentes.

[Appendicitis versus nonspecific acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound]. / Apendicitis versus dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico: rendimiento diagnóstico de la ecografía.

PURPOUSE: The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to differentiate appendicitis from nonspecific acute abdominal pain, that is the most common process requiring differential diagnosis in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients admitted for suspicion of appendicitis were prospectively evaluated in our hospital during two years (2013-2014). Cases of nonspecific acute abdominal pain and appendicitis assessed by ultrasound were enrolled in the study. The different variables collected were statistically analyzed by descriptive, univariate and diagnostic accuracy studies. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were studied, 143 cases of nonspecific acute abdominal pain and 132 cases of appendicitis. Ultrasound sensitivity and specificity to differentiate appendicitis were 94.7% and 87.4% respectively, with a 12.6% rate of false positives and a 5.3% rate of false negatives. The rate of false negatives in perforated group was 17.4% and analysis according to Pediatric Appendicitis Score risk groups showed a 12.2% rate of false positives in low-risk group and a 6.3% rate of false negatives in high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound in low clinical probability cases of appendicitis could rise unnecessary surgery rate, due to the significant number of false positives in this group of patients. In high probability clinical cases, ultrasound does not contribute too much to diagnosis and it could be a confusion factor by the significant number of false negative associated to perforated appendicitis.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la ecografía para diferenciar la apendicitis del dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico, principal proceso con el que requiere diagnóstico diferencial en la práctica clínica. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Se evaluaron los pacientes atendidos por sospecha de apendicitis en nuestro centro durante 2 años (2013-2014), incorporando al estudio los casos de dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico y apendicitis en los que se realizó ecografía. Las diferentes variables recogidas se analizaron estadísticamente de manera descriptiva, univariante y con estudios de rendimiento diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 275 casos; 143 casos de dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico y 132 casos de apendicitis. La sensibilidad y especificidad de la ecografía para diferenciar apendicitis fue del 94,7% y 87,4%, respectivamente, con un porcentaje de falsos positivos del 12,6% y de falsos negativos del 5,3%. El porcentaje de falsos negativos en el grupo de apendicitis perforada alcanzó el 17,4% y el análisis según los grupos de riesgo establecidos por el Pediatric Appendicitis Score mostró un porcentaje de falsos positivos del 12,2% en el grupo de bajo riesgo y de falsos negativos del 6,3% en el grupo de alto riesgo. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de la ecografía en casos de baja probabilidad clínica de apendicitis podría incrementar la tasa de cirugía innecesaria, debido al significativo número de falsos positivos en este grupo de pacientes. En casos de alta probabilidad clínica de apendicitis, la ecografía aporta poco al diagnóstico, e incluso podría ser un factor de confusión por el significativo número de falsos negativos asociados a la apendicitis perforada.

Apendicitis versus dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico: rendimiento diagnóstico de la ecografía / Appendicitis versus nonspecific acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound

Objetivo. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la ecografía para diferenciar la apendicitis del dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico, principal proceso con el que requiere diagnóstico diferencial en la práctica clínica. Material y métodos. Se evaluaron los pacientes atendidos por sospecha de apendicitis en nuestro centro durante 2 años (2013-2014), incorporando al estudio los casos de dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico y apendicitis en los que se realizó ecografía. Las diferentes variables recogidas se analizaron estadísticamente de manera descriptiva, univariante y con estudios de rendimiento diagnóstico. Resultados. Se estudiaron 275 casos; 143 casos de dolor abdominal agudo inespecífico y 132 casos de apendicitis. La sensibilidad y especificidad de la ecografía para diferenciar apendicitis fue del 94,7% y 87,4%, respectivamente, con un porcentaje de falsos positivos del 12,6% y de falsos negativos del 5,3%. El porcentaje de falsos negativos en el grupo de apendicitis perforada alcanzó el 17,4% y el análisis según los grupos de riesgo establecidos por el Pediatric Appendicitis Score mostró un porcentaje de falsos positivos del 12,2% en el grupo de bajo riesgo y de falsos negativos del 6,3% en el grupo de alto riesgo. Conclusiones. El uso de la ecografía en casos de baja probabilidad clínica de apendicitis podría incrementar la tasa de cirugía innecesaria, debido al significativo número de falsos positivos en este grupo de pacientes. En casos de alta probabilidad clínica de apendicitis, la ecografía aporta poco al diagnóstico, e incluso podría ser un factor de confusión por el significativo número de falsos negativos asociados a la apendicitis perforada (AU)

Purpose. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to differentiate appendicitis from nonspecific acute abdominal pain, that is the most common process requiring differential diagnosis in clinical practice. Material and methods. Patients admitted for suspicion of appendicitis were prospectively evaluated in our hospital during two years (2013-2014). Cases of nonspecific acute abdominal pain and appendicitis assessed by ultrasound were enrolled in the study. The different variables collected were statistically analyzed by descriptive, univariate and diagnostic accuracy studies. Results. A total of 275 patients were studied, 143 cases of nonspecific acute abdominal pain and 132 cases of appendicitis. Ultrasound sensitivity and specificity to differentiate appendicitis were 94.7% and 87.4% respectively, with a 12.6% rate of false positives and a 5.3% rate of false negatives. The rate of false negatives in perforated group was 17.4% and analysis according to Pediatric Appendicitis Score risk groups showed a 12.2% rate of false positives in low-risk group and a 6.3% rate of false negatives in high-risk group. Conclusions. The use of ultrasound in low clinical probability cases of appendicitis could rise unnecessary surgery rate, due to the significant number of false positives in this group of patients. In high probability clinical cases, ultrasound does not contribute too much to diagnosis and it could be a confusion factor by the significant number of false negative associated to perforated appendicitis (AU)